# 20.2014-4 Application of credit in cases involving a death tax convention.
(a) *In general.* (1) If credit for a particular foreign death tax is authorized by a death tax convention, there is allowed either the credit provided for by the convention or the credit provided for by section 2014, whichever is the more beneficial to the estate. For cases where credit may be taken under both the death tax convention and section 2014, see paragraph (b) of this section. The application of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following example:
(ii)(*a*) The credit authorized by the convention for death taxes imposed by Country X is computed as follows:
| | |
| --- | --- |
| () Country X tax attributable to property situated in Country X and subjected to tax by both countries ($750,000 ÷ $750,000 × $180,000) | $180,000 |
| () Federal estate tax attributable to property situated in Country X and subjected to tax by both countries—($750,000 ÷ $1,000,000 × $273,440) | 205,080 |
| () Credit (subdivision () or (), whichever is less) | 180,000 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| () “First limitation” computed under § 20.2014-2 ($400,000 ÷ $750,000 × $180,000) | $96,000 |
| () “Second limitation” computed under § 20.2014-3 ($400,000 ÷ $1,000,000 × $273,440) | 109,376 |
| () Credit (subdivision () or (), whichever is less) | 96,000 |
(2) It should be noted that the greater of the treaty credit and the statutory credit is not necessarily the more beneficial to the estate. Such is the situation, for example, in those cases which involve both a foreign death tax credit and a credit under section 2013 for tax on prior transfers. The reason is that the amount of the credit for tax on prior transfers may differ depending upon whether the credit for foreign death tax is taken under the treaty or under the statute. Therefore, under certain circumstances, the advantage of taking the greater of the treaty credit and the statutory credit may be more than offset by a resultant smaller credit for tax on prior transfers. The solution is to compute the net estate tax payable first on the assumption that the treaty credit will be taken and then on the assumption that the statutory credit will be taken. Such computations will indicate whether the treaty credit or the statutory credit is in fact the more beneficial to the estate.
(b) *Taxes imposed by both a foreign country and a political subdivision thereof.* If death taxes are imposed by both a foreign country with which the United States has entered into a death tax convention and one or more of its possessions or political subdivisions, there is allowed, against the tax imposed by section 2001—
(1) A credit for the combined death taxes paid to the foreign country and its political subdivisions or possessions as provided for by the convention, or
(2) A credit for the combined death taxes paid to the foreign country and its political subdivisions or possessions as determined under section 2014, or
(3)(i) A credit for that amount of the combined death taxes paid to the foreign country and its political subdivisions or possessions as is allowable under the convention, and
(ii) A credit under section 2014 for the death taxes paid to each political subdivision or possession, but only to the extent such death taxes are not directly or indirectly creditable under the convention.
whichever is the most beneficial to the estate. The application of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following example:
(2)(i) The credit authorized by section 2014 for death taxes imposed by Country X (which includes death taxes imposed by Province Y according to § 20.2014-1(a)(1)) is computed as follows:
| | |
| --- | --- |
| () “First limitation” with respect to tax imposed by national government of Country X (computed under paragraph (b) of § 20.2014-2) | |
| () Gross Country X death tax attributable to Country X bonds (before allowance of provincial death taxes) (75,000 ÷ $125,000 × $18,750) | $11,250 |
| () Less credit for Province Y death taxes on such bonds | 5,625 |
| () Net Country X death tax attributable to such bonds | 5,625 |
| () “First limitation” with respect to tax imposed by Province Y (computed under paragraph (b) of § 20.2014-2) ($75,000 ÷ $75,000 × $6,000) | 6,000 |
| () Total “first limitation” | 11,625 |
| () “Second limitation” (computed under paragraph (d) of § 20.2014-3) ($75,000 ÷ $250,000 × $38,124) | 11,437 |
| $() Credit (subdivision () or (), whichever is less) | 11,437 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| () Country X tax attributable to property situated in Country X and subject to tax by both countries ($125,000 ÷ $125,000 × $18,750) | $18,750 |
| () Federal estate tax attributable to property situated in Country X and subjected to tax by both countries ($125,000 ÷ $250,000 × $38,124) | 19,062 |
| () Credit (subdivision () or (), whichever is less) | 18,750 |
(c) *Taxes imposed by two foreign countries with respect to the same property.* It is stated as a general rule in paragraph (a)(2) of § 20.2014-1 that if credits against the Federal estate tax are allowable under section 2014, or under section 2014 and one or more death tax conventions, for death taxes paid to more than one country, the credits are combined and the aggregate amount is credited against the Federal estate tax. This rule may result in credit being allowed for taxes imposed by two different countries upon the same item of property. If such is the case, the total amount of the credits with respect to such property is limited to the amount of the Federal estate tax attributable to the property, determined in accordance with the rules prescribed for computing the “second limitation” set forth in § 20.2014-3. The application of this section may be illustrated by the following example:
[T.D. 6296, 23 FR 4529, June 24, 1958, as amended by T.D. 6742, 29 FR 7928, June 23, 1964; T.D. 7296, 38 FR 34193, Dec. 12, 1973]