43 CFR § 6305.11 - What alternatives to granting access will BLM consider in cases of State and private inholdings?

---
identifier: "/us/cfr/t43/s6305.11"
source: "ecfr"
legal_status: "authoritative_unofficial"
title: "43 CFR § 6305.11 - What alternatives to granting access will BLM consider in cases of State and private inholdings?"
title_number: 43
title_name: "Public Lands: Interior"
section_number: "6305.11"
section_name: "What alternatives to granting access will BLM consider in cases of State and private inholdings?"
chapter_name: "BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR"
subchapter_number: "F"
subchapter_name: "PRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION (6000)"
part_number: "6300"
part_name: "MANAGEMENT OF DESIGNATED WILDERNESS AREAS"
positive_law: false
currency: "2026-03-24"
last_updated: "2026-03-24"
format_version: "1.1.0"
generator: "[email protected]"
authority: "16 U.S.C. 1131  43 U.S.C. 1733, 1740, 1782."
regulatory_source: "65 FR 78372, Dec. 14, 2000, unless otherwise noted."
cfr_part: "6300"
---


# 6305.11 What alternatives to granting access will BLM consider in cases of State and private inholdings?

To reduce or eliminate the need to use wilderness areas for access to State and private land, BLM may—

(a) Accept donation of the inholding, or

(b) Acquire the inholding from the owner by an exchange for federally owned land in the same State of approximately equal value or, if the owner concurs, by purchase.