# Brake System Safety Standards for Freight and Other Non-Passenger Trains and Equipment; End-of-Train Devices
**AGENCY:**
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), DOT.
**ACTION:**
Final rule; adjustment of schedule of civil penalties.
**SUMMARY:**
This document amends the schedule of civil penalties for violations of part 232 to make it consistent with the primary final rule in this proceeding or with subsequent changes made in the text of the regulation in response to petitions for reconsideration. These changes are technical amendments made solely to the schedule of civil penalties contained in appendix A to part 232, are a statement of agency policy, and are consistent with FRA's intent when issuing the final rule and its response to petitions for reconsideration in this proceeding. The adjustments will enhance FRA's safety enforcement program by ensuring that the regulated community is fully aware of its potential civil penalty liability and by ensuring that appropriate civil penalties are assessed when taking enforcement actions.
**DATES:**
*Effective Date:* The revision of Appendix A to part 232 is effective May 25, 2004.
**ADDRESSES:**
Any petition for reconsideration should reference FRA Docket No. PB-9, Notice No. 22, and be submitted in triplicate to the FRA Docket Clerk, Office of Chief Counsel, RCC-10, 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW., Mail Stop 10, Washington, DC 20590.
**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:**
James Wilson, FRA Office of Safety, RRS-14, 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW., Stop 25, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202-493-6259), or Thomas Herrmann, Trial Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel, RCC-10, 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW., Stop 10, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202-493-6053).
**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:**
**Background**
On January 17, 2001, FRA published a final rule revising the Federal safety standards governing braking systems and equipment used in freight and other non-passenger railroad train operations. *See* 66 FR 4104-217. The effective date of the final rule was May 31, 2001. *See* 66 FR 9906 (February 12, 2001) and 66 FR 29501 (May 31, 2001). The final rule contained staggered implementation dates with the majority of the rule becoming applicable on April 1, 2004. *See* 49 CFR 232.1(b) and 66 FR 4193. In response to the final rule, FRA received six petitions for reconsideration from seven parties raising various issues related to a number of the provisions contained in the final rule.
On August 1, 2001, FRA published an initial response to the petitions for reconsideration of the final rule addressing those issues raised in the petitions related to the periodic maintenance and testing requirements prescribed in subpart D of the final rule. *See* 66 FR 39683. FRA believed that it was necessary to address these issues as quickly as possible because the periodic maintenance and testing requirements prescribed in subpart D of the final rule had a compliance date of August 1, 2001. Due to the complexity of some of the issues raised in the petitions for reconsideration on other provisions of the final rule, FRA decided to address the issues related to subpart D in its initial response to the petitions and then issue a follow-up response addressing the issues pertaining to other portions of the final rule. *See id.* On April 10, 2002, FRA published its second response to petitions for reconsideration addressing all other outstanding issues raised in the petitions for reconsideration. *See* 67 FR 17556-85.
This document amends the schedule of civil penalties contained in appendix A to part 232 to make it consistent with the January 2001 final rule or with the changes made in the text in response to petitions for reconsideration. These changes are technical adjustments or corrections made solely to the schedule of civil penalties contained in Appendix A to part 232, are a statement of agency policy, and are consistent with FRA's intent when issuing the final rule and its response to petitions for reconsideration in this proceeding. The adjustments will enhance FRA's safety enforcement program by ensuring that the regulated community is fully aware of its potential civil penalty liability and by ensuring appropriate civil penalties are assessed when taking enforcement actions.
**Discussion of Corrections and Modifications**
This document is making six corrections or adjustments to the schedule of civil penalties contained in Appendix A to part 232. First, the listed civil penalties associated with § 232.205 are being corrected to reflect the changes made to this section by FRA second response to petitions for reconsideration. In that response, a new paragraph (b) was added to this section to clarify the inspection requirements related to the addition of solid blocks of cars, and paragraph (f) of the section was removed to avoid duplication. *See* 69 FR 17573-75, 17582. Thus, what were paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section in the January 2001 final rule are now paragraphs (c) through (f). However, the penalty schedule was never modified to reflect these changes. Consequently, FRA is correcting the penalty schedule items for this section to reflect the above-noted amendments.
Secondly, a typographical error in the penalty schedule amount associated with § 232.207(a) is also being corrected. The January 2001 final rule showed the civil penalty for a complete failure to perform a Class IA brake test as $15,000. *See* 66 FR 4212. This should have read $5,000 and is being so corrected.
Third, the penalty schedule items associated with the Class II brake test provisions of § 232.209 are being adjusted by adding a clarifying citation for paragraph (d) of this section. Paragraph (d) of this section requires the performance of a Class I brake test on any car added to a train via a Class II brake test at the next forward location where facilities are available for performing such a test. The clarifying adjustment directs the reader to the footnote following the schedule of civil penalties, which makes clear that the penalties associated with the failure to perform a proper Class I brake test would be applicable in these instances.
Fourth, FRA is also amending the penalty schedule items associated with Class III brake tests requirements contained in § 232.211. When issuing its second response to petitions for reconsideration of the final rule, FRA added a paragraph (d) containing a modified Class III brake test in those instances where the continuity of a train's brake pipe is broken or interrupted with the train otherwise remaining unchanged. *See* 67 FR 17583. However, at the time the provision was added, no specific civil penalty was associated to a violation of the new provision. This document amends the schedule of civil penalties by adding a specific reference to paragraph (d) of this section and assigns a certain civil penalty consistent with a partial failure to perform a Class III brake test.
Fifth, the items in the schedule related to the extended haul train provisions of § 232.213 are being clarified to include a potential civil penalty amount for the general operation provision of paragraph (b) of this section. This penalty is currently applied to situations where an extended haul train is operated outside the restrictions contained in paragraph (a) that are not otherwise specifically covered by the penalties associated with that paragraph. For example, this would include such acts as exceeding the allowable number of pick-ups or set-outs with an extended haul train.
Finally, FRA is making corrections to the penalty items associated with §§ 232.213(a)(2)-(3), (5)(i), and (8), and 232.217(c). The items associated with these sections direct the reader to footnote (2) at the end of the schedule of civil penalties. Because there is only one footnote at the end of the penalty schedule, the reference for the above-noted provisions is being corrected to cite to footnote (1).
**General Information**
As the amendments contained in this document are minor corrections or adjustments to the existing schedule of civil penalties associated with part 232, which constitutes a general statement of agency policy relating potential civil penalty assessment amounts, FRA is issuing this document as a final rule. FRA views the amendments as technical corrections to a general statement of agency policy and not a substantive rule. Consequently, FRA believes that, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A) and (B), this action is both exempted from the requirement for prior public notice and that good cause exists for finding that prior public notice of this action is unnecessary.
**Regulatory Impact**
**Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures**
This final rule has been evaluated in accordance with Executive Order 12866 and DOT policies and procedures. The modifications contained in this final rule are not considered significant because they are intended merely to correct and adjust the schedule of civil penalties associated with part 232 consistent with FRA's intent when publishing the primary final rule in this proceeding on January 17, 2001. No changes or modifications are being made to any regulatory provision contained in part 232. There is no economic impact caused by the corrections and clarifications contained in this final rule.
**Regulatory Flexibility Act**
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.* ) requires a review of rules to assess their impact on small entities. FRA certifies that this final rule does not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Because the modifications contained in this final rule merely correct and adjust the schedule of civil penalties associated with part 232 and because no changes or modifications are being made to any regulatory provision contained in part 232, FRA has concluded that there are no substantial economic impacts on small units of government, businesses, or other organizations.
**Paperwork Reduction Act**
Because the modifications contained in this final rule merely correct and adjust the schedule of civil penalties associated with part 232 and because no changes or modifications are being made to any regulatory provision contained in part 232, this final rule does not change any of the information collection requirements contained in part 232.
**Environmental Impact**
FRA has evaluated this final rule in accordance with its “Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts” (FRA's Procedures) (64 FR 28545, May 26, 1999) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.* ), other environmental statutes, Executive Orders, and related regulatory requirements. FRA has determined that this document is not a major FRA action (requiring the preparation of an environmental impact statement or environmental assessment) because it is categorically excluded from detailed environmental review pursuant to section 4(c) of FRA's Procedures.
**Federalism Implications**
FRA believes it is in compliance with Executive Order 13132. Because the modifications contained in this final rule merely correct and adjust the schedule of civil penalties associated with part 232 and because no changes or modifications are being made to any regulatory provision contained in part 232, this document will not have a substantial effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. This final rule will not have federalism implications that impose any direct compliance costs on State and local governments.
**Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995**
Pursuant to Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4, 2 U.S.C. 1531), each Federal agency “shall, unless otherwise prohibited by law, assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments, and the private sector (other than to the extent that such regulations incorporate requirements specifically set forth in law).” Section 202 of the Act (2 U.S.C. 1532) further requires that “before promulgating any general notice of proposed rulemaking that is likely to result in the promulgation of any rule that includes any Federal mandate that may result in expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any 1 year, and before promulgating any final rule for which a general notice of proposed rulemaking was published, the agency shall prepare a written statement” detailing the effect on State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. The statutory figure of $100,000,000 has been adjusted upward for inflation to $120,700,000. Because the modifications contained in this final rule merely correct and adjust the schedule of civil penalties associated with part 232 and because no changes or modifications are being made to any regulatory provision contained in part 232, this document will not result in the expenditure, in the aggregate, of $120,700,000 or more in any one year, and thus preparation of such a statement is not required.
**Energy Impact**
Executive Order 13211 requires Federal agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for any “significant energy action.” 66 FR 28355 ( May 22, 2001). Under the Executive Order, a “significant energy action” is defined as any action by an agency (normally published in the *Federal Register* ) that promulgates or is expected to lead to the promulgation of a final rule or regulation, including notices of inquiry, advance notices of proposed rulemaking, and notices of proposed rulemaking: (1)(i) That is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 or any successor order, and (ii) is likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy; or (2) that is designated by the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy action. FRA has evaluated this final rule in accordance with Executive Order 13211. Because the modifications contained in this final rule merely correct and adjust the schedule of civil penalties associated with part 232 and because no changes or modifications are being made to any regulatory provision contained in part 232, FRA has determined that this document will not have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Consequently, FRA has determined that this regulatory action is not a “significant energy action” within the meaning of Executive Order 13211.
**List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 232**
Penalties, Railroad power brakes, Railroad safety.
**Adoption of the Amendments**
**49 CFR Part 232**
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, part 232 of chapter II, subtitle B of title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended to read as follows:
**PART 232—[AMENDED]**
1. The authority citation for part 232 is revised to read as follows:
**Authority:**
49 U.S.C. 20102-20103, 20107, 20133, 20141, 20301-20303, 20306, 21301-21302, 21304; 28 U.S.C. 2461, note; 49 CFR 1.49 (c), (m).
**49 CFR Part 232**
2. Appendix A to part 232 is revised to read as follows:
| Section | Violation | Willful |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | |
| 232.15 Movement of power brake defects: | | |
| (a) Improper movement, general | (
) | (
) |
| (11) Failure to make determinations and provide notification of en route defect | $2,500 | $5,000 |
| (b) Complete failure to tag | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (1) Insufficient tag or record | 1,000 | 2,000 |
| (2), (4) Improper removal of tag | 2,000 | 4,000 |
| (3) Failure to retain record of tag | 2,000 | 4,000 |
| (c) Improper loading or purging | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (e) Improper placement of defective equipment | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| 232.19 Availability of records | (
) | (
) |
| | | |
| 232.103 All train brake systems: | | |
| (a)-(c), (h)-(i) Failure to meet general design requirements | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (d) Failure to have proper percentage of operative brakes from Class I brake test | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (e) Operating with less than 85 percent operative brakes | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (f) Improper use of car with inoperative or ineffective brakes | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (g) Improper display of piston travel | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (m) Failure to stop train with excess air flow or gradient | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (n) Securement of unattended equipment: | | |
| (1) Failure to apply sufficient number of hand brakes; failure to develop or implement procedure to verify number applied | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (2) Failure to initiate emergency | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (3) Failure to apply hand brakes on locomotives | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (4) Failure to adopt or comply with procedures for securing unattended locomotive | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (o) Improper adjustment of air regulating devices | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (p) Failure to hold supervisors jointly responsible | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| 232.105 Locomotives: | | |
| (a) Air brakes not in safe and suitable condition | 1,000-5,000 | 2,000-7,500 |
| (b) Not equipped with proper hand or parking brake | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (c)(1) Failure to inspect/repair hand or parking brake | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (2) Failure to properly stencil, tag, or record | 2,000 | 4,000 |
| (d) Excess leakage from equalizing reservoir | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (e) Improper use of feed or regulating valve braking | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (f) Improper use of passenger position | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (g) Brakes in operative condition | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| 232.107 Air sources/cold weather operations: | | |
| (a)(1), (2) Failure to adopt or comply with monitoring program for yard air sources | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (3) Failure to maintain records | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (b) Failure to blow condensation | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (c) Use of improper chemicals | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (d) Failure to equip or drain yard air reservoirs | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (e) Failure to adopt or comply cold weather operating procedures | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| 232.109 Dynamic brakes: | | |
| (a) Failure to provide information | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (b) Failure to make repairs | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (c) Failure to properly tag | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (d) Failure to maintain record of repair | 2,000 | 4,000 |
| (e) Improper deactivation | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (f) Improper use of locomotive as controlling unit | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (g) Locomotive not properly equipped with indicator | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (h) Rebuilt locomotive not properly equipped | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (j) Failure to adopt or comply with dynamic brake operating rules | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (k) Failure to adopt or comply with training on operating procedures | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| 232.111 Train handling information: | | |
| (a) Failure to adopt and comply with procedures | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (b) Failure to provide specific information | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| | | |
| 232.203 Training requirements: | | |
| (a) Failure to develop or adopt program | 7,500 | 11,000 |
| (b)(1)-(9) Failure to address or comply with specific required item or provision of program | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (c) Failure to adopt or comply with two-way EOT program | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (d) Failure to adopt or comply with retaining valve program | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (e) Failure to maintain adequate records | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (f) Failure to adopt and comply with periodic assessment plan | 7,500 | 11,000 |
| 232.205 Class I brake test—initial terminal inspection: | | |
| (a) Complete failure to perform inspection | (
)10,000 | 15,000 |
| (c)(1)-(4), (6)-(8) Partial failure to perform inspection | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (c)(5) Failure to properly adjust piston travel (per car) | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (d) Failure to use carman when required | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (e) Failure to provide proper notification | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (f) Failure to void compressed air | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| 232.207 Class IA brake tests—1,000-mile inspection: | | |
| (a) Complete failure to perform inspection | (
)5,000 | 7,500 |
| (b)(1)-(6) Partial failure to perform inspection | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (c) Failure to properly designate location | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (c)(1) Failure to perform at designated location | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (c)(2) Failure to provide notification | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| 232.209 Class II brake tests—intermediate inspection: | | |
| (a) Complete failure to perform inspection | (
)5,000 | 7,500 |
| (b)(1)-(5), (c) Partial failure to perform inspection | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (d) Failure to conduct Class I after Class II pick-up | (
) | (
) |
| 232.211 Class III brake tests—trainline continuity inspection: | | |
| (a) Complete failure to perform inspection | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (b)(1)-(4), (c) Partial failure to perform inspection | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (d) Failure to restore air pressure at rear | 2,500 | 2,500 |
| 232.213 Extended haul trains: | | |
| (a)(1) Failure to properly designate an extended haul train | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (a)(2)-(3), (5)(i), (8) Failure to perform inspections | (
) | (
) |
| (a)(4) Failure to remove defective car (per car) | 2,000 | 4,000 |
| (a)(5)(ii), (6) Failure to conduct inbound inspection | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (a)(7) Failure to maintain record of defects (per car) | 2,000 | 4,000 |
| (b) Improper movement or use of extended haul train | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| 232.215 Transfer train brake tests: | | |
| (a) Failure to perform inspection | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (b) Failure to perform on cars added | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| 232.217 Train brake system tests conducted using yard air: | | |
| (a) Failure to use suitable device | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (b) Improper connection of air test device | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (c) Failure to properly perform inspection | (
) | (
) |
| (d) Failure to calibrate test device | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (e) Failure to use accurate device | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| 232.219 Double heading and helper service: | | |
| (a) Failure to perform inspection or inability to control brakes | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (b) Failure to make visual inspection | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (c) Use of improper helper link device | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| | | |
| 232.303 General requirements: | | |
| (b)-(d) Failure to conduct inspection or test when car on repair track | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (e) Improper movement of equipment for testing | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (e)(1) Failure to properly tag equipment for movement | 2,000 | 5,000 |
| (e)(2)-(4) Failure to retain record or improper removal of tag or card | 2,000 | 4,000 |
| (f) Failure to stencil or track test information | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| 232.305 Repair track air brake tests: | | |
| (a) Failure to test in accord with required procedure | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (b)-(d) Failure to perform test | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| 232.307 Single car tests: | | |
| (a) Failure to test in accord with required procedure | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (b)-(c) Failure to perform test | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| 232.309 Repair track air brake test and single car test equipment and devices: | | |
| (a)-(f) Failure to properly test or calibrate | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| | | |
| 232.403 Design standards for one-way devices: | | |
| (a)-(g) Failure to meet standards | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| 232.405 Design standards for two-way devices: | | |
| (a)-(i) Failure to meet standards | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| 232.407 Operating requirements for two-way devices: | | |
| (b) Failure to equip a train | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (c) Improper purchase | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (f)(1) Failure of device to be armed and operable | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (f)(2) Insufficient battery charge | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (f)(3) Failure to activate the device | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (g) Improper handling of en route failure, freight or other non-passenger | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (h) Improper handling of en route failure, passenger | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| 232.409 Inspection and testing of devices: | | |
| (a) Failure to have unique code | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (b) Failure to compare quantitative values | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (c) Failure to test emergency capability | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (d) Failure to properly calibrate | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| | | |
| 232.503 Process to introduce new technology: | | |
| (b) Failure to obtain FRA approval | 10,000 | 15,000 |
| 232.505 Pre-revenue service acceptance testing plan: | | |
| (a) Failure to obtain FRA approval | 5,000 | 7,500 |
| (b) Failure to comply with plan | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| (f) Failure to test previously used technology | 5,000 | 7,500 |
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 18, 2004.
Allan Rutter,
Federal Railroad Administrator.