Skip to content
LexBuild

Safety Management Systems for Domestic Passenger Vessels

---
identifier: "/us/fr/2021-04011"
source: "fr"
legal_status: "authoritative_unofficial"
title: "Safety Management Systems for Domestic Passenger Vessels"
title_number: 0
title_name: "Federal Register"
section_number: "2021-04011"
section_name: "Safety Management Systems for Domestic Passenger Vessels"
positive_law: false
currency: "2021-03-01"
last_updated: "2021-03-01"
format_version: "1.1.0"
generator: "[email protected]"
agency: "Homeland Security Department"
document_number: "2021-04011"
document_type: "proposed_rule"
publication_date: "2021-03-01"
agencies:
  - "Homeland Security Department"
  - "Coast Guard"
cfr_references:
  - "33 CFR Part 96"
  - "46 CFR Part 71"
  - "46 CFR Part 115"
  - "46 CFR Part 176"
rin: "1625-AC65"
fr_citation: "86 FR 11913"
fr_volume: 86
docket_ids:
  - "Docket No. USCG-2020-0123"
fr_action: "Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; correction."
---

#  Safety Management Systems for Domestic Passenger Vessels

**AGENCY:**

Coast Guard, DHS.

**ACTION:**

Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

**SUMMARY:**

The Coast Guard is correcting an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) published in the *Federal Register* of January 15, 2021, seeking public comment on the potential use of Safety Management Systems (SMSs) to improve safety and reduce marine casualties on board U.S.-flagged passenger vessels. The ANPRM contained an incorrect internal cross-reference in the list of questions for the public.

**DATES:**

March 1, 2021.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:**

For information about this document, call or email Lieutenant Kimberly Gates, Vessel and Facility Operating Standards Division (CG-OES-2), U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-1455, email *[email protected].*

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:**

In FR Doc. 2021-01058, beginning on page 3899 in the issue of January 15, 2021, make the following correction in the *SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION* section:

On page 3902 in the third column, in the paragraph for Question 19, replace the text “question 4” with the text “question 6.”

The corrected Question 19 reads as follows: “How would the costs and benefits of expanding other existing regulations, as detailed in question 6, differ from the costs and benefits of requiring SMSs for all passenger vessels?”

Dated: February 19, 2021.

M.T. Cunningham,

Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.