Skip to content
LexBuild

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Transaction Credit at Equity 7, Section 118(a)

---
identifier: "/us/fr/2025-12516"
source: "fr"
legal_status: "authoritative_unofficial"
title: "Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Transaction Credit at Equity 7, Section 118(a)"
title_number: 0
title_name: "Federal Register"
section_number: "2025-12516"
section_name: "Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Transaction Credit at Equity 7, Section 118(a)"
positive_law: false
currency: "2025-07-07"
last_updated: "2025-07-07"
format_version: "1.1.0"
generator: "[email protected]"
agency: "Securities and Exchange Commission"
document_number: "2025-12516"
document_type: "notice"
publication_date: "2025-07-07"
agencies:
  - "Securities and Exchange Commission"
fr_citation: "90 FR 29921"
fr_volume: 90
docket_ids:
  - "Release No. 34-103361"
  - "File No. SR-NASDAQ-2025-046"
---

#  Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Transaction Credit at Equity 7, Section 118(a)

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [^1] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, [^2] notice is hereby given that on June 18, 2025, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.

[^1] 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).

[^2] 17 CFR 240.19b-4.

**I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change**

The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's transaction credit at Equity 7, Section 118(a).

The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at *https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rulefilings,* at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

**II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change**

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

**A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change**

**1. Purpose**

The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend M-ELO Supplemental Credit B to align with how the incentive was originally intended to apply. Currently, the Exchange's Supplemental Credit B at Equity 7, Section 118(a) to members for displayed quotes/orders (other than Supplemental Orders or Designated Retail Orders) that provide liquidity (per share executed) states that in order to receive the relevant $0.00015 per share credit, the “member, through one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs, executes a combined volume of at least a 5 million shares ADV through midpoint orders provided and M-ELO Orders during the month.” The Exchange proposes to note that the 0.00015 per share credit applies when “a member, through one or more of its Nasdaq Market Center MPIDs, executes a combined volume of at least a 5 million shares ADV through midpoint orders provided *(that execute against M-ELO)* and M-ELO Orders during the month.” The proposed rule change would align with how the incentive was intended to apply as originally communicated to customers at the  establishment of M-ELO Supplemental Credit B. [^3]

[^3]*See* Equity Trader Alert #2022-54, Nasdaq and PSX Pricing Updates Effective June 1, 2022 (May 31, 2022).

**2. Statutory Basis**

The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act, [^4] in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act, [^5] in particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.

[^4] 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).

[^5] 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).

The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the market system “has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors and listed companies.” [^6]

[^6] Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (“Regulation NMS Adopting Release”).

Likewise, in *NetCoalition* v. *Securities and Exchange Commission*[^7] (“NetCoalition”) the D.C. Circuit upheld the Commission's use of a market-based approach in evaluating the fairness of market data fees against a challenge claiming that Congress mandated a cost-based approach. [^8] As the court emphasized, the Commission “intended in Regulation NMS that `market forces, rather than regulatory requirements' play a role in determining the market data . . . to be made available to investors and at what cost.” [^9]

[^7]*NetCoalition* v. *SEC,* 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010).

[^8]*See* NetCoalition, at 534-535.

[^9]*Id.* at 537.

Further, “[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker dealers'. . . .” [^10]

[^10]*Id.* at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).

Moreover, the Exchange believes that the change to M-ELO Supplemental Credit B is reasonable because the change aligns with how the incentive was intended to apply as originally communicated to customers at the establishment of M-ELO Supplemental Credit B. The Exchange believes that the change to the fee language is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the change will apply to all similarly situated members and reflects the understanding customers currently have about how the fee is assessed.

**B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition**

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive, or opportunities available at other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and with alternative trading systems that have been exempted from compliance with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges.

Because competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, the Exchange believes that the degree to which fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited. Further, as the proposal reflects the understanding customers currently have about how M-ELO Supplemental Credit B is assessed and aligns with how the incentive was originally intended to apply as communicated to customers at the establishment of M-ELO Supplemental Credit B, the proposal does not impose an undue burden on competition.

**C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others**

No written comments were either solicited or received.

**III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action**

The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act. [^11]

[^11] 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).

At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

**IV. Solicitation of Comments**

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

**Electronic Comments**

• Use the Commission's internet comment form ( *https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ); or

• Send an email to *[email protected].* Please include file number SR-NASDAQ-2025-046 on the subject line.

**Paper Comments**

• Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-NASDAQ-2025-046. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website ( *https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,  Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR-NASDAQ-2025-046 and should be submitted on or before July 28, 2025.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. [^12]

[^12] 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.