# Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From Brazil, India, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, and Thailand: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
**AGENCY:**
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
**SUMMARY:**
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from Brazil, India, Mexico, the Republic of Korea (Korea), and Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels indicated in the “Final Results of Sunset Reviews” section of this notice.
**DATES:**
Applicable April 10, 2026.
**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:**
David De Falco, Trade Agreements Policy and Negotiations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2178.
**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:**
**Background**
On January 28, 2004, Commerce published the *Orders* in the *Federal Register.*[^1] On October 3, 2025, Commerce published the notice of initiation of these fourth sunset reviews of the *Orders,* pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). [^2]
[^1]*See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Brazil,* 69 FR 4112 (January 28, 2004); *Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from India,* 69 FR 4110 (January 28, 2004); *Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Mexico,* 69 FR 4112 (January 28, 2004); *Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the Republic of Korea,* 69 FR 4109 (January 28, 2004); and *Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Thailand,* 69 FR 4111 (January 28, 2004) (collectively, *Orders* ).
[^2]*See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews,* 90 FR 48048 (October 3, 2025).
On October 20, 2025, Commerce received timely and complete notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from the domestic interested parties [^3] within the deadline specified in the 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). [^4] The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status within the meaning of section 771(9)(C) of the Act as U.S. producers of the domestic like product. [^5] On December 9, 2025, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that it had received a notice of intent to participate from the domestic interested parties. [^6]
[^3] The domestic interested parties are Insteel Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corp.
[^4]*See* Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, “Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Brazil—Domestic Industry's Notice of Intent to Participate,” dated October 20, 2025; Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, “Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from India—Domestic Industry's Notice of Intent to Participate,” dated October 20, 2025; Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, “Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Mexico—Domestic Industry's Notice of Intent to Participate,” dated October 20, 2025; Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, “Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Korea—Domestic Industry's Notice of Intent to Participate,” dated October 20, 2025; and Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, “Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Thailand—Domestic Industry's Notice of Intent to Participate,” dated October 20, 2025.
[^5]*Id.*
[^6]*See* Commerce's Letter, “Sunset Reviews Initiated on October 3, 2025,” dated December 9, 2025.
On November 3, 2025, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i), domestic interested parties filed timely and adequate substantive responses. [^7] Commerce did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested party. On December 8, 2025, Commerce notified the ITC that it did not receive substantive response from any respondent interested parties. [^8] As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce is conducting expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the *Orders.*
[^7]*See* Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, “Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Brazil—Domestic Industry's Substantive Response,” dated November 3, 2025; Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, “Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from India—Domestic Industry's Substantive Response,” dated November 3, 2025; Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, “Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Mexico—Domestic Industry's Substantive Response,” dated November 3, 2025; Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, “Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Korea—Domestic Industry's Substantive Response,” dated November 3, 2025; and Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, “Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Thailand—Domestic Industry's Substantive Response,” dated November 3, 2025.
[^8]*See* Commerce's Letter, “Sunset Reviews Initiated on October 3 2025,” dated December 8, 2025.
Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by 47 days. [^9] Additionally, due to a backlog of documents that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an additional 21 days. [^10] Accordingly, the deadline for these final results is now April 7, 2026.
[^9]*See* Memorandum, “Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government,” dated November 14, 2025.
[^10]*See* Memorandum, “Tolling of all Case Deadlines,” dated November 24, 2025.
**Scope of the Orders**
The product covered by these *Orders* is PC strand from Brazil, India, Mexico, Korea, and Thailand. For the full description of the scope of the *Orders, see* the Issues and Decisions Memorandum. [^11]
[^11]*See* Memorandum, “Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Brazil, India, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, and Thailand,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
**Analysis of Comments Received**
A complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation of the *Orders* and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the *Orders* were to be revoked, is provided in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. [^12] A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached in the Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered users at *https://access.trade.gov.* In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be directly accessed at *https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.*
[^12]*Id.*
**Final Results of Sunset Reviews**
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1), and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the *Orders* would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted-average dumping margins up to 118.75 percent for Brazil, 102.07 percent for India, 77.20 percent for Mexico, 54.19 percent for Korea, and 12.91 percent for Thailand.
**Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO)**
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective, orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
**Notification to Interested Parties**
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218 and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: April 7, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
**Appendix**
**List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum**
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation