Skip to content
LexBuild

28 USC § 2406 - Credits in actions by United States; prior disallowance

---
identifier: "/us/usc/t28/s2406"
source: "usc"
legal_status: "official_legal_evidence"
title: "28 USC § 2406 - Credits in actions by United States; prior disallowance"
title_number: 28
title_name: "JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE"
section_number: "2406"
section_name: "Credits in actions by United States; prior disallowance"
chapter_number: 161
chapter_name: "UNITED STATES AS PARTY GENERALLY"
part_number: "VI"
part_name: "PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS"
positive_law: true
currency: "119-73"
last_updated: "2026-03-26"
format_version: "1.1.0"
generator: "[email protected]"
source_credit: "(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 972; Pub. L. 108–271, § 8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)"
---

# § 2406. Credits in actions by United States; prior disallowance

In an action by the United States against an individual, evidence supporting the defendant’s claim for a credit shall not be admitted unless he first proves that such claim has been disallowed, in whole or in part, by the Government Accountability Office, or that he has, at the time of the trial, obtained possession of vouchers not previously procurable and has been prevented from presenting such claim to the Government Accountability Office by absence from the United States or unavoidable accident.

---

**Source Credit**: (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 972; Pub. L. 108–271, § 8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 774 (R.S., §§ 236, 951; , §§ 304, 305, ).

Word “action” was substituted for “suits”, in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

, U.S.C., 1940 ed., provided that “no claim for a credit shall be admitted, upon trial”, etc. This was changed to “evidence supporting the defendant’s claim for a credit shall not be admitted”, to clarify the meaning of the section. The case of , D.C.Va. 1940, 32 F.Supp. 39, reviews the conflicting decisions on the question whether compliance with the section must be pleaded, and offers persuasive argument that it need not be, and that the section was designed as a rule of evidence. The wording of the remainder of the section also supports this conclusion, as pointed out by Judge Learned Hand in ., D.C.N.Y. 1926, 16 F.2d 307, followed in the Heard case.

Changes in phraseology were made.

## Editorial Notes

### Amendments

2004— substituted “Government Accountability Office” for “General Accounting Office” in two places.