# § 1581. Civil actions against the United States and agencies and officers thereof
**(a)** The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to contest the denial of a protest, in whole or in part, under section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
**(b)** The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced under section 516 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
**(c)** The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced under section 516A or 517 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
**(d)** The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review—
**(1)** any final determination of the Secretary of Labor under section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the eligibility of workers for adjustment assistance under such Act;
**(2)** any final determination of the Secretary of Commerce under section 251 of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the eligibility of a firm for adjustment assistance under such Act;
**1** any final determination of the Secretary of Commerce under section 273 [^1] of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the eligibility of a community for adjustment assistance under such Act; and
See References in Text note below.
**(4)** any final determination of the Secretary of Agriculture under section 293 or 296 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2401b) <sup>1</sup> with respect to the eligibility of a group of agricultural commodity producers for adjustment assistance under such Act.
**(e)** The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review any final determination of the Secretary of the Treasury under section 305(b)(1) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979.
**(f)** The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action involving an application for an order directing the administering authority or the International Trade Commission to make confidential information available under section 777(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930.
**(g)** The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review—
**(1)** any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to deny a customs broker’s license under section 641(b)(2) or (3) of the Tariff Act of 1930, or to deny a customs broker’s permit under section 641(c)(1) of such Act, or to revoke a license or permit under section 641(b)(5) or (c)(2) of such Act;
**(2)** any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customs broker’s license or permit, or impose a monetary penalty in lieu thereof, under section 641(d)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930; and
**(3)** any decision or order of the Customs Service to deny, suspend, or revoke accreditation of a private laboratory under section 499(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930.
**(h)** The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review, prior to the importation of the goods involved, a ruling issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, or a refusal to issue or change such a ruling, relating to classification, valuation, rate of duty, marking, restricted merchandise, entry requirements, drawbacks, vessel repairs, or similar matters, but only if the party commencing the civil action demonstrates to the court that he would be irreparably harmed unless given an opportunity to obtain judicial review prior to such importation.
**(i)**
**(1)** In addition to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Court of International Trade by subsections (a)–(h) of this section and subject to the exception set forth in subsection (j) of this section, the Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced against the United States, its agencies, or its officers, that arises out of any law of the United States providing for—
**(A)** revenue from imports or tonnage;
**(B)** tariffs, duties, fees, or other taxes on the importation of merchandise for reasons other than the raising of revenue;
**(C)** embargoes or other quantitative restrictions on the importation of merchandise for reasons other than the protection of the public health or safety; or
**(D)** administration and enforcement with respect to the matters referred to in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of this paragraph and subsections (a)–(h) of this section.
**(2)** This subsection shall not confer jurisdiction over an antidumping or countervailing duty determination which is reviewable by—
**(A)** the Court of International Trade under section 516A(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1516a(a)); or
**(B)** a binational panel under section 516A(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1516a(g)).
**(j)** The Court of International Trade shall not have jurisdiction of any civil action arising under section 305 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
---
**Source Credit**: (Added Pub. L. 96–417, title II, § 201, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1728; amended Pub. L. 98–573, title II, § 212(b)(1), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2983; Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, § 1891(1), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2926; Pub. L. 100–449, title IV, § 402(a), Sept. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 1883; Pub. L. 103–182, title IV, § 414(a)(1), title VI, § 684(a)(1), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2147, 2219; Pub. L. 111–5, div. B, title I, § 1873(b)(2), Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 414; Pub. L. 114–125, title IV, § 421(b), Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 168; Pub. L. 116–113, title IV, § 423(a)(1), Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 65.)
### Amendment of Section
For termination of amendment by , see Effective and Termination Dates of 1988 Amendment note below.
## Editorial Notes
### Prior History of Court
The United States Customs Court, the predecessor of the Court of International Trade, was omitted in the general revision of this chapter by .
The predecessor of the United States Customs Court was the Board of General Appraisers which was created by the Customs Administrative Act of . The Board was under the administrative supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury.
From 1890 to 1926, the Board of General Appraisers had jurisdiction over all protests from decisions of the collectors of customs and appeals for reappraisement under sections 13 and 14 of the Customs Administrative , .
The Customs Court was established by , §§ 1, 2, , sections 405a and 405b of Title 19, Customs Duties, and said act transferred to it all the jurisdiction and powers of the former Board of General Appraisers. The Tariff Act of June 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 518, , , continued the Customs Court as constituted on with, however, several important changes.
### References in Text
Section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (a), is classified to , Customs Duties.
Section 516 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (b), is classified to , Customs Duties.
Sections 516A and 517 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (c), are classified to sections 1516a and 1517 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
The Trade Act of 1974, referred to in subsec. (d), is , , , which is classified principally to chapter 12 (§ 2101 et seq.) of Title 19, Customs Duties. Sections 223, 251, 293, and 296 of the Act are classified to sections 2273, 2341, 2401b, and 2401e, respectively, of Title 19. Section 273 of the Act, formerly classified to , was repealed by , , . For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under and Tables.
Section 305(b)(1) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, referred to in subsec. (e), is classified to , Customs Duties.
Section 777(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (f), is classified to , Customs Duties.
Section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (g)(1), (2), is classified to , Customs Duties.
Section 499(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (g)(3), is classified to , Customs Duties.
Section 305 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (j), is classified to , Customs Duties.
### Prior Provisions
A prior section 1581, , , related to powers of the Customs Court generally, prior to the general revision of this chapter by . See .
### Amendments
2020—Subsec. (i). , (B), (D), designated existing provisions as par. (1), redesignated former pars. (1) to (4) as subpars. (A) to (D), respectively, of par. (1), added par. (2), and struck out former concluding provisions which read as follows: “This subsection shall not confer jurisdiction over an antidumping or countervailing duty determination which is reviewable either by the Court of International Trade under section 516A(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 or by a binational panel under article 1904 of the North American Free Trade Agreement or the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement and section 516A(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930.”
Subsec. (i)(1)(D). , substituted “subparagraphs (A) through (C) of this paragraph” for “paragraphs (1)–(3) of this subsection”.
2016—Subsec. (c). inserted “or 517” after “516A”.
2009—Subsec. (d)(3), (4). substituted “273” for “271” in par. (3) and added par. (4).
1993—Subsec. (g)(3). , added par. (3).
Subsec. (i). , inserted “the North American Free Trade Agreement or” before “the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement” in last sentence.
1988—Subsec. (i). temporarily inserted at end “This subsection shall not confer jurisdiction over an antidumping or countervailing duty determination which is reviewable either by the Court of International Trade under section 516A(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 or by a binational panel under article 1904 of the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement and section 516A(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930.” See Effective and Termination Dates of 1988 Amendment note below.
1986—Subsec. (g)(1). substituted “(3)” for “(3) or (c)”.
1984—Subsec. (g)(1). amended par. (1) generally, substituting “a customs broker’s license under section 641(b)(2) or (3) or (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, or to deny a customs broker’s permit under section 641(c)(1) of such Act, or to revoke a license or permit under section 641(b)(5) or (c)(2) of such Act” for “or revoke a customhouse broker’s license under section 641(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930”.
Subsec. (g)(2). amended par. (2) generally, substituting “any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customs broker’s license or permit, or impose a monetary penalty in lieu thereof, under section 641(d)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930” for “any order of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customhouse broker’s license under section 641(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930”.
## Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
### Effective Date of 2020 Amendment
Amendment by effective on the date on which the USMCA enters into force (), but not applicable to certain determinations under , Customs Duties, or binational panel reviews under NAFTA, see , set out as a note under .
### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by effective 180 days after , see , set out as an Effective Date note under , Customs Duties.
### Effective Date of 2009 Amendment
Except as otherwise provided and subject to certain applicability provisions, amendment by effective upon the expiration of the 90-day period beginning on , see , set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2009 Amendment note under , Customs Duties.
### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment
Amendment by effective on the date the North American Free Trade Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [], but not applicable to any final determination described in section 1516a(a)(1)(B) or (2)(B)(i), (ii), or (iii) of Title 19, Customs Duties, notice of which is published in the Federal Register before such date, or to a determination described in , notice of which is received by the Government of Canada or Mexico before such date, or to any binational panel review under the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement, or to any extraordinary challenge arising out of any such review, that was commenced before such date, see , formerly set out as an Effective Date note under former .
### Effective and Termination Dates of 1988 Amendment
Amendment by effective on date United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement enters into force (), and to cease to have effect on date Agreement ceases to be in force, see section 501(a), (c) of , set out in a note under , Customs Duties.
### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by effective on close of 180th day after , see , set out as a note under , Customs Duties.
### Effective Date
Chapter effective , and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see , set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under .
Subsecs. (d) and (g) to (i) of this section applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after , see .
### Application of 1993 Amendment
, , 107 Stat 2219, which provided a rule regarding the application of the amendments made by to accreditations of private laboratories, was repealed by , , , effective on the date the USMCA entered into force ().
### Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of , as modified, set out as a note under . For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in as of , see , as amended generally by , and , set out as a note under .
### Effect of Termination of USMCA Country Status
For provisions relating to effect of termination of USMCA country status on sections 401 to 432 of , see , Customs Duties.